On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:44:46PM +0200, Fco. J. Ballesteros wrote: > : In that sense, the 'cpu server' is outdated nomenclature. > I wonder, how many 9fans are *actually* using CPU servers? [do not > count a CPU server that runs your fossil as such, it's a file server, > isn't it?]
I think it's already mentioned in the original papers that one of the main reason for 'cpu' servers is bandwidth/proximity to the file server(s), so I in a way it has always been a misnomer. uriel
