On 9/21/05, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was under the impression that most if not all new USB controllers > > were OHCI and not UHCI. Perhaps that's just been my exposure. > > that's interesting. i thought that once myself last year, but suddenly > all the ones i see are UHCI/EHCI. perhaps there is a market survey somewhere. > it doesn't really matter: there are many OHCI systems and it's sensible to > drive them. > (and that's easier than the ndis wrapper FOR THAT PURPOSE given the nature of > that code.) > > I sometimes think they just like to flip flop to perturb the more esoteric OS driver support.
Either way I'm still looking at that OHCI code from Inferno you passed me, trying to figure out what I can safely strip out and still make compile and function. It's got it's own namespace code and stuff in it though and I'm not sure what that will cause. I've finally gotten the time to integrate it into a kernel config file and see the compilation errors but the stability of my plan 9 system is suspect. Oftentimes the mouse pointer will go ape-shit and I'll have to drawterm in to shutdown fossil nicely and reboot. Now I just drawterm in all the time. My spare time is variable and never large these days.
