2005/9/30, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > on amd64 it is: > > short is 16 bits, as before for Plan 9 > int and long are 32 bits, as before > long long is 64 bits, also as before > pointers are 64 bits, not as before. (it's that last bit causes most of the > trouble.)
Yeah, way too much code in Unix that uses void pointer to integer casting. ``Oops''. > i think it must be LLP64 in your scheme At least in Solaris the #define for both amd64 and SPARC64 is `LP64'. This is found in one of the include files under feature_tests.h (see cvs.opensolaris.org). --Devon > > > ---------- Doorgestuurd bericht ---------- > From: Vester Thacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 04:31:45 -0700 > Subject: [9fans] 64-Bit programming model. > Okay, time for the "dumb question of the month". > > Concerning Plan 9 64-Bit support, which Long Pointer programming model > is being used with Sparc64 and AMD64 ports? LLP64, LP64 or ILP64. Just > curious. > > Forgive my ignorance, I am a layman and nowadays get my schooling > though search engine results. > > --vester > >
