> "We added two (library) calls readf and writef that perform file I/O > besides resolving the name. We found ourselves calling them a lot, because > in many cases it's very convenient. They would be > an opportunity to "batch" walk/open/read(s)/clunk, which happen > a lot. However, this would require changing the kernel (even more than we > did for Plan B)."
Well once you've changed the protocol to accomodate some form of batching, changes are good you'll have to change the kernel to use it. Russ
