YAMANASHI Takeshi wrote:
This argv model was in the original xcpu stuff, should we really instead
be doing this:
echo exec date > ctl, i.e. just require the args as part of the exec
command? It seems easier to me somehow to do it this way.
This model looks easier to me too. I'm curious why the original
author didn't do it this way though.
I think we were just feeling our way around, trying to understand how
this ought to work, so that's how Vic implemented it.
I am going to go to this new usage.
ron
