> I would rather see a merging of devfs > into the devsd framework. Then 9fat: > doesn't need to change at all and we're > back to having all the disk devices served > by #S. I'm not sure what the name should > be (sdV0 for virtual?), but then you can > just parse ctl commands written to > /dev/sdV0/ctl to create new disks under > /dev/sdV0.
Along with this, I would like to see some disk i/o kprocs so that devfs is not slower than the usual disks. Russ
