i like it when chip companies ask "why would you want to do that" and the obvious answer is "because the data sheet says i can and i want to". i've been thru this with a few vendors.
brucee On 1/20/06, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>when is a .so not a .so? when it's a ld script of course! > >>yup, /lib/libc.so on my fc4 box is a ..... script. > > curiously, i was just installing fc4 on a machine today. > following an i/o error on a few blocks of a hard drive containing an ext3, > that had emptied /usr/etc to the confusion of all, subsequent use of > redhat-something's fsck destroyed the whole file system rather instantly, > so i thought it might be time for an upgrade. > fc4's installation said there was an i/o error on installation, > that was ``a serious problem'', it could not continue, OK? > as usual my ``that's not OK, actually'' met with a blank face, > and OK rebooted the system. i think it's all a hint to replace the drive. > clearly, from ron's message, i'm in for a good time! > we'll know computing has cracked it when that sort of thing > is a question on ``who wants to be a millionaire?''. > all helps to keep those synapses active. > >
