On Wed Feb 1 18:49:24 CST 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > i don't know anything about the reasoning for this. efficiency? > > support for a static /dev? i don't know. > > Probably because they don't have a single devfs they can agree on? >
that assumes that there was a dynamic /dev when networking was added. nobody was even thinking about dynamic devices when networking was added to linux - erik
