> can you cat /mail/fs/mbox/113/subject?
>
> On Mon Feb 6 10:32:25 CST 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> i've always used mh for mail on unix. i like it, as it gives you
>> many of the same benefits to having a fs interface to your mail
>> that upas/fs does.
>>
>> tim
no and i wasn't suggesting that mh is capable of providing as a
rich an interface as upas/fs. just that it is what i prefer when
i can't use upas/fs, since people were asking. and Russ was
wondering if he was the only one around here using it. :)