i had a strange dream about something like ...
> <>[?]/net/dns { echo google.com ip >[1=?1]; cat <[0=?1] }
(just like \1, \2 etc in sam - change '?' to whatever you like.)
in this case the first construct would do an open and the
result may be 4 or 104 but "?1" will know. and then it's over,
as dup() is good for the rest. it handles nesting and sequencing
if you think about it.
using fds beyond "i have one open so let's do some file-ops
with it" is foolish. both srv and ssl break this and hence can't
fit in (can't be imported or exported). writing a number (relevant
only to the requesting machine) doesn't work from remote.
check out the amusing error messages.
brucee
On 3/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > well it's a horrible ad-hoc hack. do you expect it to work?
>
> It was before my first cup of coffee and I could not resist the
> temptation. The ";" complaint isn't yet clear to me, however.
>
> ++L
>
>
