don't go there ... unless you are looking at adding another few thosand lines of redundancy.
brucee On 3/29/06, Lou Kamenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/28/06, LiteStar numnums <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've no idea if you've seen Minix 3, but with all the bizzare crap that is > > in there, it might as well be Linux. > > i second that, as charles pointed out sometime ago reading linux and > now minix (3) code could be quite an adventure (torture?). > > cheers, > l >
