> ioctl(fd, SETVOLUME, &vol); is more comfortable. of course. then we can fuss trying to have the same value for SETVOLUME on each system in a distributed set and re-learn all that The Newcastle Connection and RFS painfully discovered about that (but Linux has yet to learn); the interface requires passing a reference to vol (just to pass its value, so it can't be an expression, and also losing its type in the process because ioctl takes void*); and every language needs to set up its own `binding' for all those operations and values; and ...
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Adrian Tritschler
- Re: [9fans] new compilers rog
- Re: [9fans] new compilers rog
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Roman Shaposhnick
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Steve Simon
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Russ Cox
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Joel Salomon
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Martin C. Atkins
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Jack Johnson
- Re: [9fans] new compilers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Charles Forsyth
- Re: [9fans] new compilers jmk
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Brantley Coile
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Burton Samograd
- Re: [9fans] new compilers David Leimbach
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Charles Forsyth
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Rob Pike
- Re: [9fans] new compilers David Leimbach
- Re: [9fans] new compilers Brantley Coile
- Re: [9fans] new compilers erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] new compilers erik quanstrom
