On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:22:30PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > On 4/18/06, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The interesting thing is that Plan 9's great namespace manipulation > functionality + the fact that each process can have a private > namespace means that Plan 9 probably has the best shot at dealing with > "DLL-hell", like when 10 programs need 10 different versions of the > same shared library to run respectively. A simple script wrapped > around the loading of a program can set up a namespace such that > ambiguities don't exist.
And you would have to go through all of the aforementioned troubles to achieve exactly what ? What is it, that shared libraries are good at ? Thanks, Roman.
