I've actually seen worse :) I saw a function in a certain library with 36 parameters before.
On 4/27/06, Ronald G Minnich <[email protected]> wrote:
this is from the openib mailing list :-) ron === On Thu, 27 April 2006 12:49:36 +0200, Heiko J Schick wrote: >> +u64 hipz_h_alloc_resource_qp(const struct ipz_adapter_handle >> adapter_handle, >> + struct ehca_pfqp *pfqp, >> + const u8 servicetype, >> + const u8 daqp_ctrl, >> + const u8 signalingtype, >> + const u8 ud_av_l_key_ctl, >> + const struct ipz_cq_handle send_cq_handle, >> + const struct ipz_cq_handle receive_cq_handle, >> + const struct ipz_eq_handle async_eq_handle, >> + const u32 qp_token, >> + const struct ipz_pd pd, >> + const u16 max_nr_send_wqes, >> + const u16 max_nr_receive_wqes, >> + const u8 max_nr_send_sges, >> + const u8 max_nr_receive_sges, >> + const u32 ud_av_l_key, >> + struct ipz_qp_handle *qp_handle, >> + u32 * qp_nr, >> + u16 * act_nr_send_wqes, >> + u16 * act_nr_receive_wqes, >> + u8 * act_nr_send_sges, >> + u8 * act_nr_receive_sges, >> + u32 * nr_sq_pages, >> + u32 * nr_rq_pages, >> + struct h_galpas *h_galpas); 25 parameters? If you tell me which drugs were involved in this code, I know what to stay away from. Might be the current record for any code ever proposed for inclusion.
