i should have said "glyph."
the thing you're missing is that there is no precombined form
of {X+combining double breve} for any roman letter X that i know of.
this means that most utf renderers will give you either "X�" or �.
not having a precombined form is a pain.
- erik
On Fri May 19 17:35:43 CDT 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > CA: Corporate Author
> > Nizhegorodskai?a? gosudarstvennai?a?
> > sel?skokhozi?a?i?stvennai?a? akademii?a?
> >
> > the character that probablly doesn't look right is a combining double breve.
>
> What ?!?! How come this character ended up being a compound one ? The fact
> that it looks like one when rendered doesn't deprive it from being unique.
>
> Or am I missing something here ?
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
