On Wed Jun 7 17:07:21 CDT 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: acme and previously sam has done me well with all manner of badly formatted and ill-concieved c, c++, perl, pre-f77 fortran, etc.
perhaps i don't get it, but there's nothing i've seen in other editors that helped with bad code. bad code is just as bad in colour -- and harder on the eyes. > Corey wrote: > > Will god likewise save us from Rio and Acme? > In fact I use rio in Linux at my job. And by now I don't use Acme > because I have to deal with veryawfulcode (lots of very bad indentations > fruit of many tab/spaces/tab/spaces at code changes, functions more than > 1500 lines long, an unworkable hierarchy of header files...). I agree > that acme is really pleasant for well-written code. As an example, I > like surfing plan9's with it. Also my code looks better if it's written > with acme, but this part is too subjective. :)
