On 7/25/06, Francisco J Ballesteros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just curious. Anyone besides us at urjc tried omero? It has images, as well as bugs :-)
It has been a long time since I tried omero... I want to again, soon. Mainly I think I remember a feature that once I got my windows laid out the way I wanted to I could essentially "tar" them up then untar again to restore the layout. Is this correct? Like i said, It's been a while :-) Dave
On 7/25/06, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i think the ideal "browser" for plan 9 would be acme. > > if acme could handle a box-based layout with images and text, the > "web browser" could consist of webfs, http/layout and http/acmectl. > > (giving acme the ability to display images inline with text would make > replacing rio with acme more palatable.) > > - erik > > On Tue Jul 25 05:36:25 CDT 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If we were to formulate mozilla for an OS like Plan9 or Inferno, what > > would be different in that software architecture? One can either > > descend into the endless void of great possibilities, or truncate that > > space at a first stage (it's just an HTTP client) and then start over > > from scratch for a second (it's a world of multi-protocol clients). > > Maintain sanity. > >
