i might be suffering from nih syndrome. i will take some time to check it out.
- erik On Tue Jul 25 16:24:11 CDT 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just curious. Anyone besides us at urjc tried omero? > It has images, as well as bugs :-) > > > On 7/25/06, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i think the ideal "browser" for plan 9 would be acme. > > > > if acme could handle a box-based layout with images and text, the > > "web browser" could consist of webfs, http/layout and http/acmectl. > > > > (giving acme the ability to display images inline with text would make > > replacing rio with acme more palatable.) > > > > - erik > > > > On Tue Jul 25 05:36:25 CDT 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > If we were to formulate mozilla for an OS like Plan9 or Inferno, what > > > would be different in that software architecture? One can either > > > descend into the endless void of great possibilities, or truncate that > > > space at a first stage (it's just an HTTP client) and then start over > > > from scratch for a second (it's a world of multi-protocol clients). > > > Maintain sanity.
