I´ve found that many times there is a lot of latency added because of multiple
walk, open, read, clunk. Not that this could be the cause for this problem, but it reminded me of it. Anyone actually studied this? Anyone considered replacing this with, say, put/get rpcs that do it all? In some cases there are multiple read (or write), rounds, but many times, I see the 4 rpcs just to get a bunch of bytes. This was a concern for us while using omero across slow network links. just curiosity, thanks in any case. On 9/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that you've completed STEP 1 - ask if anyone knows the answer - on to STEP 2 - use the tools you have been given to find out for yourself. On Fri Sep 22 01:34:39 EDT 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi everybody, hope this message doesn't come out like a troll. > I'm just wondering why some Plan 9 programs seem to act so slowly. > Acme news is incredibly sluggish, and page takes far longer to display > an image or a doc page than it has any right to. Admittedly, this is > running on a PII machine, but even on one of those, I expect better > performance. Hell, my 486 was better at displaying images. > > John > -- > "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers" -- Shakespeare, Henry VI
