> Don't bother submitting a patch; I've updated the SOURCE section of wait(2).
That was half my patch.
> You didn't need the source to get the answer to your question
> either; note the phrase `These routines set errstr.' and see
> intro(2) for what this means.
Is waiting without children considered an error condition? Checking…
waitpid returned -1: no living children
…looks like. OK, a lack of understanding on my part; never mind.
--Joel
