* ron minnich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >this is a goofy argument. i haven't seen "we've always done it this > >way" trotted out as an argument. perhaps i missed it. > > "If you change sam this way, it's inconsistent with rio and acme". > > reads to me like > "But it's always worked this way".
I'm just questioning _gratuitious_ changes. One way to prevent those is to kick loose a discussion about them. (Side effects may include complete loss of focus on the subject at hand.) Martin
