Re: [9fans] rx - wot no stderr?

[Gorka guardiola]

On 1/17/07, Steve Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I was surprised to find plan9's implementaion of
rx(1) and rexexec(8) don't support a seperate socket
for stderr out of the remote application.

I can see that it is not that great, but somtimes
when doing (from the manpage):

        eqn paper | rx kremvax troff -ms | rx deepthought lp

It would be nice to see your troff error messages
onscreen rather than having to collect them from the
printer.

I always survived this redirecting error messages to a file in
the remote command. ¿Isn't that enough?.
--
- curiosity sKilled the cat