On Sun Feb 18 17:08:00 EST 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think you mean the one on 788. I'm far from comfortable enough with
> the code here to suggest a patch, though. Certainly not comfortable
> enough to incorporate it into my lexer.
>
sorry. i was using an older version of the lexer. line 788 is the correct
one to delete.
i read the current code like this
[...]
assert(first digit is '0');
if(not octal(c))
goto dc;
while(is octal(c))
GETC();
goto ncu; // i.e. this can't be floating point.
dc:
/* check for floating point */
[...]
ncu:
/* check integer size suffixes */
