Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
On 2/22/07, Adriano Verardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
Sorry, I was saying ...
I tried both "9p" and "9P".
I don't know whether or not there is a specialized mount utils,
as in FreeBSD.
If not, IMHO, mount should recognize the available fs from /proc.
9p is not listed in /proc/filesystem, also when statically linked in the
kernel. I think It should be.
If there is no 9p, 9p2000, or 9P in /proc/filesystems, there is
something wrong with the way you have built your kernel or kernel
module.
I see.
When you compile it as a module and than insmod it, do you
see anything funny in /var/log/messages or dmesg?
I tried all possible ways to configure 9p.
Loadable module: 9p is in the lsmod output.
In-Kernel: in /var/log/dmesg I see "Activated 9P2000 ..."
In any case:
- no reference in /proc/filesystem
- mount -t 9p 127.0.0.1 /mnt -o debug=0xf
-> Unknown file system type '9p'
Adriano
