On Wed Mar 7 13:18:26 EST 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > (e) 9p appliances. the cannonical example of this would be ken's > > fileserver. it doesn't run the same kernel as the cpu server. but it > > does speak 9p. thus it is able to be a very high-reliablity, well- > > featured, efficient plan 9 appliance without a large or complex codebase. > > (even the slightly crunchy pc port.) > > drawterm and sns/rangboom to name a few more..
perhaps i didn't make myself clear. i would contrast drawterm with what i mean by "appliance". by appliance, i would mean something like ken's fs, which serves files via 9p. it is unencombered by other programs or the existance of userland at all. another example would be the coraid SR appliance, which serves blocks via AoE. drawterm is an application. the upside of an appliance is realiablity, performance and the lack of a need to make everything work in the same space. the downside is that everything the appliance needs must be custom-made for the appliance and it's a totally inflexable platform. (ease of use should be mentioned, but i think we're still lacking in that department.) this level of effort and lack of flexability make sense for some things. nobody wants their fileserver to crash. but if a terminal or cpu server go down, it shouldn't take more than a minute to get them going again. - erik
