On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:28:08PM -0800, John Floren wrote: > On 3/6/07, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip> > >Now, I run rio, on linux and plan 9, and I like it. But, that said, if > >Plan 9 has an achilles heel, rio is it. It's the first (and last) > >thing many people see on Plan 9. > </snip> > > If the average Linux user is as picky about his window managers as I > am, rio is certainly a turnoff. I've tried and rejected most every > window manager available for Linux either because they can't be > customized, the keyboard shortcuts are nearly nonexistant, or > dual-head support is broken.
I might not qualify for any average or even Linux user, but I have done much of the same wrt "desktop" UI's. I'm sticking with Ion3 (and rarely dwm on some tricky systems where lua or something blows up). Practically never having to resize or move frames (windows) and never having things obscured or having to look for something or do pixel tweaks it is something I'll never expect to want to give up again.
