>What?!  You were one of the objectors, unless my memory was failing
>me.  It was Vita Nuova's own "sh" that was deemed to be the way into
>the future.

i'm fairly sure i didn't say the latter, so something must have
been misunderstood.  i did make some comment about the conventions
of the various shells not having changed much since the start, but
even that was a suggestion as to what someone else might have meant
by an apparently disparaging remark.

Reply via email to