> Despite having just sold off the X-Scale embedded to Marvel, I expect Intel
> to get back into the embedded game with ultra low power X86 chips. Alpha is
> gone, Sparc is Sun only, MIPs might survive as an embedded architecture.
intel still sells embedded xscale processors. i looked at this a while
back
http://www.intel.com/design/network/prodbrf/309430.htm
kind of looks like a network-cell processor, doesn't it?
> I think all of the Intel chips going forward are going have EM64T. So plan9
> should have good support for that. Plus you get 8 more registers with EM64T,
> which the architecture could really use.
i'm not sure what advantage more registers present in modern (amd|intel)/x64
chips. a value in l1 cache is only 1 cycle away. so i'm not sure what the
practical difference is between something in a register and something in l1.
> Because the new Apple stuff is X86 based, ports shouldn't be too hard, delta
> chip support.
i'd agree with it not being hard. but that is a considerable amount of
work. granted, most architechtures are not as bad as the pee cee, but
one still has to interface with the boot rom, figure out how to find
and configure memory, set up interrupts, figure out how to talk to
the bus, how to print "hello, world", etc.
ignoring the pc, since it's a pig, here's how much code is in each of the
various ports (my somewhat out-of-date copy):
bitsy 15240
ppc 10315
mtx 7863
while new ports will be great, you need to be prepared for some heavy
lifting.
- erik
