Only that this time it's not lisp. You get the same complexity yet you are not able to trace all the internals of your system, errr, browser.
On 4/1/07, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ah, a reprise of the emacs os idea. - erik On Sun Apr 1 06:35:47 EDT 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > and XML and w3c, not systems. you can see that when people quite seriously say > things like ``we won't even need an operating system in future, just a browser [and plug-ins]'' > without realising that all they've really done is turn the browser into the operating system. > which still leaves the problem of coming up with a reasonable design.
