Geoff wrote: // (or is it on the drive with the damaged fossil and you // don't trust the drive?).
exactly. i'm also replacing it with something about five times the size at the same cost. amazing what a few years will do. once the transition is complete, i'll most of the old disk as an "other". i'm also considering options for a more disaster-tollerant setup. Bakul wrote: // Wouldn't this lose all old snapshots? I believe the method described will take the root of fossil, before /active, the normally visible part. I'm particularly encouraged by the example involving a corrupted disk and fossil/flfmt in fossil(4). i'll let you know if my experience says otherwise.
