official C went downhill more than 20 years ago. fortunately you can still program in what i called "Safe-C" in some flippant paper.
i was particulalry impressed with VS2005 which has wchar_t as a fundamental type which can't be assigned to anything. shoot me, i did a if(sizeof(wchar_t) == sizeof(Rune)) etc. it seems that subjective C is more popular than objective C. brucee On 4/27/07, David Leimbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Those are all real C99 features :-). Whether anyone really thinks they're worth a damn is another question. On 4/26/07, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > are these c99 "features" from /sys/src/cmd/cc/c99 really features > or are they "unwanted"? > > Not done (yet?): > 11. _Complex, _Imaginary, _Bool > 18. Notation for universal characters \uXXXX > 26. _Bool, float _Complex, double _Complex, long double _Complex > > - erik > -- - Passage Matthew 5:37: But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
