[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You may not have noticed, as it is no longer a popular approach, that
earlier Unixes provided innumerable tools to generate C code. So much
so that the "goto" was retained more to make such code generation
easier than to please a handful of spoiled programmers.
your point?
That C and not assembler ought to be the target language, no matter
the application. That assembler is deprecated in favour of C.
++L
If that ever comes to pass, I'm going back to a wire-wrap tool.
There *can be no* one-size fits-all final answers unless and until all progress
is to be called off and stagnation and decline to the death are mandated from
on-high.
Not even for biologicals with billion+ year history.
'adapt or die' may have long cycle, but it is an unforgiving one.
Bill
