On May 7, 2007, at 1:02 AM, Wes wrote:
I've had some success compiling a cpu+auth+term plan9 kernel for a
learning box before, worked really well too. I would ask why it's not
done by default but then I remind myself 'thats not the plan9 way to
think!' and ignore my own question. :)
Wes
OK, since I am new to plan 9, and I am interested in the plan 9 way
to think, could you explain what is wrong with a cpu+auth+term kernel?
Just to put forward my ignorance, I would think that you would need
to have term plus any other server you needed. I would think that I
need some sort of console access to any kind of server. Would that
not entail having a terminal server at a minimum?
Kim
