We're trying hard (by reading most of the tree concurrently, and using Op on the slow link) to get o/mero fast enough not to worry about TOC. But in any case, should we add toc, probably just a raw list of, say, one relative path per line, a-la-du, would suffice.
Anyway, time will say. :) On 5/25/07, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > However, we're still experimenting with this and I think that just >> > placing a "toc" file >> >> i think just using s-expressions would do the trick, and be much easier to read. i was referring specifically to nemo's application, although it's often true in general. s-expressions can look reasonably attractive, and double-clicking works on them. you can't say either about xml. certainly most xml i've seen makes me think i'm dyslexic. it also looks constipated, and two health problems in one standard is just too much.
