> no, i don't think so. they're about the same amount of code, and json is > less regular and more of a hack. as js is, though i've seen worse > (java! oh, man! what were they THINKING?)
some sort of agreement over the structure and wide support for it sometimes beats having to re-invent *yet another* s-expression form noone seems to really want, such as the one created by rivest etc. oz
