* Kris Maglione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
> It doesn't have to appear at the program start, and the MIT > license gives explicit permission to sublicense its code. The > copyright doesn't have to be at the top of the file, but it must > remain on the code. This is perfectly LGPL compatible. Okay, as long as I can link that lib into all the other apps I'm going to "port" to 9p, I'm fine with that. > >I personally would feel better w/ LGPL (just because it always > >worked fine). Any objections against LGPL ? > > Yes, it's very long and significantly more restrictive than MIT. > I don't see the need to add the restrictions of the LGPL, nor > the verbosity or proselatizing that it contains throughout. That > being said, there's nothing stopping you from sublicensing it > with the LGPL. > > >hmm, couldnt find it :( > >I've tried: http://www.suckless.org/snaps/wmii+ixp-20070508.tgz > > In the wmii tarball, it's called wmiir.c. I should setup nightly > tarballs, but the plain libixp distibution comes from hg. Ah, ok, there it is :) But it doesn't seem to work properly w/ the u9fs + npfs servers. "wmirr ls -ld /etc" works as it should (like /bin/ls does), but other commands (ie read or ls w/o -d) do not output anything. I compared the server debug between linux kernel client and wmirr, seems that an Topen is missing at wmirr. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
