* Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yeah - bad luck on that kernel -- I was a crappy maintainer and wasn't > doing proper regressions and some runtime bugs slipped in without me > seeing it. You should be able to backport the fs/9p code from the > latest and greatest official kernel (not the v9fs devel directory) > without much trouble and things will be much more stable for you.
Ok, I'll have a look. > The recursive mount problem is something that you have to watch > yourself on -- single threaded file servers (like spfs and u9fs) > will just end up blocking indefinitely. The kernel should not hangup if the server is in trouble. Perhaps some reasonable timeout would be fine - if we dont get an response, abort w/ IO error. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
