On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:13:23PM -0700, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
if it handles 9p: scheme, it better be 9p, not some dialect based
on implementer's (mis)understanding of it. browser plugins, by virtue of
what they plug into, have a potential to spread fast. it will not serve
anyone if a popular derivation becomes a de facto standard for 9p.

While I'd generally be the first to argue such a point, I don't see where you see a problem. It should act exactly the same as file:, ftp:, http:, smb:, ... The URI format just describes the location of a resource. The resource should be handled exactly the same as any other resource. The only real problem I see here is that the protocol specification. It would be nice to handle unix domain sockets, since p9p uses them, but I think any other protocol would be superfluous, and should probably be part of the resource.

--
Kris Maglione

The meek shall inherit the earth,
but not its mineral rights.

Attachment: pgpbxoXyYQyUB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to