On 7/6/07, Richard Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Does some of the simplicity come from being linux-specific?  Comments
say "guest and host run the same kernel".  Or is it generic enough to
work with Plan 9 too?

it's working up to me calling LHINIT and then LHCRASH.


- My interest in Xen is pragmatic: there are plenty of hosting companies
offering "virtual servers" based on Xen, and some at least are happy
to let you run a Plan 9 guest kernel.  (In particular I can recommend
http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk from personal experience.)  How long
before lguest reaches that level of maturity?  Sadly, simplicity in
itself is not much of a marketing advantage in the real world.

Ah, so keeping a xen port is good. That's fine. But for THX, Xen is
just too hard.

ron

Reply via email to