> BTW: I'm still interested in functional differences between > FUSE and 9P. For example, does 9P support all *nix style > inode types (ie. symlinks, devices, pipes, etc) ?
As others have noted, no. And that is a feature, the whole point of 9P is that all files are equal, and doing away with abominations like symlinks, device nodes and ioctls. The only good thing about FUSE is that it confirms that the lunix people have not learned anything in the last thirty years. uriel
