On 10-Aug-07, at 3:34 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
I'm sorry to hear it's not well structured.
Less a problem of structure of gsoc than of a mismatch between how the plan9 community operates, the gsoc expectations, and my over- expectations. I think Uriel did a great job getting something organized and off the ground. I'm just not sure that as an "organization" we're a good match - I think we just don't have enough developers on most of our projects to get a good head of steam going for most students.
Paul
Paul On 10-Aug-07, at 12:28 PM, Uriel wrote: > The plan9-tech list was created (not by me) after various gsoc> students *and* mentors plain refused to use 9fans, and really, who can> blame them when even jmk refuses to use 9fans anymore. >> Anyway, keep jumping to assumptions, bashing people who tries to help,> and doing what you have doing so far, it seems to have worked really > well. > > uriel > > P.S.: Oh, I know, you would rather have everyone use private email, > that has worked so wonderfully so far. > > On 8/10/07, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 8/10/07, Steve Simon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> good one uriel, good one. >> >> so, set me straight on this: somone is leading the tribe of True >> 3lite >> Hackers across the desert, gonna part the waters etc., take 'em to >> the >> promised land, and so on. >> >> So, uh, who are these tech contributors who are going? I can only >> gaze>> in awe. And, once they get there, I assume they'll take a blanket off>> the blanket tree and take a nap (ref. to CM Kornbluth is entirely >> intentional; I'll let you find story and title). >> >> ron >> p.s. met the coraid guys at linux world yesterday. Very, very fine >> stuff. I love the fact that they are 'the linux storage company'. >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFGvOOlpJeHo/Fbu1wRAhwVAKCHRJquefKgAFfSnZugJgWuLWbRzgCf fgBy y4b5mvW20Q7QpgdsoQqfIN4= =mYF7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
