On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:38:44PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > would have to commit just for stacks. With 2,000 processes, that > would rise to 32GB just for stacks.
With 4GB RAM, wouldn't you allocate at least that much swap no matter what?
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:38:44PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > would have to commit just for stacks. With 2,000 processes, that > would rise to 32GB just for stacks.
With 4GB RAM, wouldn't you allocate at least that much swap no matter what?