coding at home and getting something significant working is what i meant. but by all means write to the list instead.
brucee On 9/7/07, Lyndon Nerenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2007-Sep-6, at 21:09 , Bruce Ellis wrote: > > > someone written a line of relevant code during this "discussion"? > > Be careful. Coding to mailing list discussions results in Linux. > > FWIW, the discussion here has made more sense than any and all > arguments/conversations I've had with UNIX vendors over the last > decade-and-a-half. > > And I'm talking about both malloc and spawn. > > The concept of assembling processes in user space is intriguing, and > I'd like to hear more from the people who have thought/played with > the idea. > > I'm convinced there is no solution to brk; it's an untenable > implementation (although it made perfect sense at the time). As long > as our programming languages insist on direct memory pointers I don't > see a way out. But so far all the alternatives just lead to madness ... > > --lyndon >
