On 10/7/07, Andrew Wingorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David Leimbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/6/07, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> qnx is probably the most reasonable so-called microkernel > >> i've seen described > >> (but i haven't seen their code). > > > > It's "open sourced" now, as of a few weeks ago. > > its was realy great news of a few weeks ago, i was squatting > free and openqnx in ORG zones for fork of this project > (if the owner will be wants to close the code again :) > > But IMH professonal O, the plan is much better. > After all, IHateThisNotation() :) > > > Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? > > Linux is not interesting > Lots of noise from nowhere >
L4 has basically nothing to do with Linux. There are ports of Linux to L4, using it as a hardware architecture though, which provides many of the benefits of things like Xen (running multiple instances of Linux etc)
