> The problem is that the clients with higher latencies badly need to > be able to cache. And the ones with better latencies can afford not > caching :)
the irony is, the higher the latency, the greater the cost of syncronization. - erik
> The problem is that the clients with higher latencies badly need to > be able to cache. And the ones with better latencies can afford not > caching :)
the irony is, the higher the latency, the greater the cost of syncronization. - erik