> (gets me 4 parallel interactive fdisk's on the four nodes md,d1,d2,d3 > -- it seems weird but worked wonderfully well. cpu is just not set up > to do this type of thing, and neither would your consterm be).
we had a cpu that could talk to multiple nodes at the same time (multiplex i/o) in 2002, i believe. as well as an 'rx' that did the same thing. i'll dig through my fs, but chances are slim that i still have it. no idea why it didn't get much use. oh, wait, it was plan9-only :)
