On Nov 12, 2007 2:39 PM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 12, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Aki Nyrhinen wrote: > > > in my limited experience, converting programs that are > > not excercises in how to use all the possible peculiarities > > of posix are reasonably easy to get compiling under ape. > > > > the problem is, nobody wants reasonably easy. > > And yet everyone elsewhere wants easy. Did I step into another > reality distortion field? > > > > > c++ would be very nice too, so there would be one step > > less on the road towards firefox. i'm sure ron is more > > interested in fortran90. > > > > People are working on it. In fact, someone said something about an > update to the second edition C++ preprocessor a few days/weeks ago. > Who uses Fortran 90? I haven't seen any F90 compiler in wide use; the > FSF is still working with F77. >
I'm pretty sure gfortran does F90...
