On Nov 21, 2007 6:51 AM, andrey mirtchovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that is probably correct. doesn't amd only "suggest" the clock > frequency to be what they think the processor speed is when compared > to the original 1GHz Athlon?
Yeah their product numbers are not really the clock speed. My understanding is they were saying an Athlon 2800 was clocked slower but still about as fast as an Intel at 2800... but that might just be my own bad memory. > > what is the current time reported by the system? try running timesync > and monitor the cpufreq for sudden increase/decreases. of course that > may have nothing to do with your real problem, but i have experience > high interrupt counts after timesync mangled my cpufreq :) > Starting timesync from the live cd does cause a lot of interrupts yes. But my network wasn't configured either, which is seemingly the same thing going on with my plan 9 installation since I didn't configure any network. perhaps timesync should not be on in the default installed distribution, and users should turn that on themselves once they have their network configured properly? > > > At this point I'm booted from the Plan 9 CD and it says I've an > > AMD-Athlon 2080.... it is, in fact, an Athlon XP 2800+ > > >
