now that you mention it, it's pretty obvious. for some reason i was hung up on the fact that one would think Message-ID: would be a clue that this is not an email address.
- erik On Mon Nov 26 17:20:31 EST 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:08:55PM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote: > > does anyone know what the exploit here is? > > some sort of outlook thing? > > Probably some spammer mistaking message IDs like > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > for addresses.
