> but it doesn't have to be. this is legit:
>
> typedef struct{
> Ehdr; // 1
> Ehdr; // 2
> uchar op[2];
> }Pkt;
my explinations stink. perhaps this gets at what
i'm saying better. the structure S0 won't have
any padding, yet the two calls to frobehdr are
just fine. i'm not sure i see the alignment problem
that requires padding all unnamed structures.
typedef struct{
uchar s[6];
uchar d[6];
uchar t[2]
}Ehdr;
frobehdr(Ehdr*)
typedef struct{
uchar s0[6];
uchar d0[6];
uchar t0[2]
uchar s1[6];
uchar d1[6];
uchar t1[2]
}S0;
void
thunk0(void)
{
S0 *s;
frobehdr((Ehdr*)s->s0);
frobehdr((Ehdr*)s->s1);
}
- erik
